They may be legal, but people who post offensive Twitter messages are undermining Canada’s democracy, Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault’s department says in a briefing note..Blacklock’s Reporter said the Liberals claim censorship of those comments is needed for “a truly democratic debate.”.“This content steals and damages lives,” wrote staff..“It intimidates and obscures valuable voices, preventing a truly democratic debate.”.Cabinet on June 23 introduced Bill C-36 that threatens Facebook, Twitter and YouTube users suspected of posting content that promotes “detestation or vilification” with house arrest or $70,000 fines. The heritage department promised public consultation on the bill..“Our objective is to ensure more accountability and transparency from online platforms while respecting the Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms,” said the June 16 briefing note..“The mandate of the Department of Canadian Heritage includes the promotion of a greater understanding of human rights.”. Twitter rants a bane to Canadian democracy: Heritage Minister .Parliament in 1970 banned hate speech under the Criminal Code, but Bill C-36 would expand the law to prohibit hurtful remarks without evidence any crime was committed..“Social media platforms such as Facebook or Twitter are increasingly central to participation in democratic, cultural and public life,” said the briefing note..“However, social media platforms can also be used to threaten, intimidate, bully and harass people or used to promote racist, anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, misogynist and homophobic views that target communities, put people’s safety at risk and undermine Canada’s social cohesion or democracy.”.The briefing note provided no examples..The Department of Justice in a June 23 Backgrounder to Bill C-36 said it “would apply to public communications by individual users on the Internet, including on social media, on personal websites and in mass e-mails,” blog posts, online news sites, “operators of websites that primarily publish their own content” and user comment sections..But a majority of Canadians, 62%, fear federal regulation of the Internet will curb lawful speech, according to a July 5 survey by the Canadian Internet Registration Authority..“With the federal government considering legislation that could have far-reaching impacts on social media, a healthy majority of Canadians agree with the concept of a law that would require platforms to remove illegal or harmful content,” said the survey report..“But their attitudes are tempered by concerns about hampering free expression.”.“The question remains whether Canada will commit to a democratic and open Internet that puts people first, or will it put a damper on the greatest transformative economic force of our time? As Internet regulation looms, public opinion on these issues matters more than ever.”.Dave Naylor is the News Editor of the Western Standard.,dnaylor@westernstandardonline.com,.Twitter.com/nobby769
They may be legal, but people who post offensive Twitter messages are undermining Canada’s democracy, Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault’s department says in a briefing note..Blacklock’s Reporter said the Liberals claim censorship of those comments is needed for “a truly democratic debate.”.“This content steals and damages lives,” wrote staff..“It intimidates and obscures valuable voices, preventing a truly democratic debate.”.Cabinet on June 23 introduced Bill C-36 that threatens Facebook, Twitter and YouTube users suspected of posting content that promotes “detestation or vilification” with house arrest or $70,000 fines. The heritage department promised public consultation on the bill..“Our objective is to ensure more accountability and transparency from online platforms while respecting the Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms,” said the June 16 briefing note..“The mandate of the Department of Canadian Heritage includes the promotion of a greater understanding of human rights.”. Twitter rants a bane to Canadian democracy: Heritage Minister .Parliament in 1970 banned hate speech under the Criminal Code, but Bill C-36 would expand the law to prohibit hurtful remarks without evidence any crime was committed..“Social media platforms such as Facebook or Twitter are increasingly central to participation in democratic, cultural and public life,” said the briefing note..“However, social media platforms can also be used to threaten, intimidate, bully and harass people or used to promote racist, anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, misogynist and homophobic views that target communities, put people’s safety at risk and undermine Canada’s social cohesion or democracy.”.The briefing note provided no examples..The Department of Justice in a June 23 Backgrounder to Bill C-36 said it “would apply to public communications by individual users on the Internet, including on social media, on personal websites and in mass e-mails,” blog posts, online news sites, “operators of websites that primarily publish their own content” and user comment sections..But a majority of Canadians, 62%, fear federal regulation of the Internet will curb lawful speech, according to a July 5 survey by the Canadian Internet Registration Authority..“With the federal government considering legislation that could have far-reaching impacts on social media, a healthy majority of Canadians agree with the concept of a law that would require platforms to remove illegal or harmful content,” said the survey report..“But their attitudes are tempered by concerns about hampering free expression.”.“The question remains whether Canada will commit to a democratic and open Internet that puts people first, or will it put a damper on the greatest transformative economic force of our time? As Internet regulation looms, public opinion on these issues matters more than ever.”.Dave Naylor is the News Editor of the Western Standard.,dnaylor@westernstandardonline.com,.Twitter.com/nobby769
