Lawyers for Artur Pawlowski filed a written legal argument with Alberta’s Court of Appeal last week arguing against his conviction for incitement of mischief.The appeal seeks to overturn Pawlowski’s conviction related to a speech he gave to protesters in Coutts, in February 2022. According to a provincial court judge, the speech was intended to incite protesters to continue the blockade of the highway which led to the U.S. border.The lawyers, who are funded by The Democracy Fund (TDF), have characterized Pawlowski’s prosecution as a “policing of words, opinion and language.” They argue that Pawlowski did not specifically encourage anyone to blockade the highway and that the trial judge’s finding was based on speculation and implication. TDF insists this is not enough to meet the high threshold required for a criminal conviction.The lawyers further argue that other interpretations are better supported by the text of the speech, including the interpretation that Pawlowski encouraged protestors to imitate Poland’s solidarity movement by walking out of their jobs, thereby expressing solidarity with the truckers and “paralyzing the system” through a legal means akin to a labour strike.Even if the Court of Appeal is satisfied that Pawlowski actively induced mischief, the lawyers argue in their written materials that the trial judge nevertheless failed to properly consider statutory defences that act as safeguards against government overreach. These safeguards prevent a person from being convicted of mischief if they are only communicating information or if they act with legal excuse or justification. In this case, Pawlowski’s justification was the constitutional exercise of free expression.Pawlowski received a 60-day jail sentence for delivering the speech, which he served in pretrial custody.In a press release, TDF said, "While a successful appeal cannot restore lost time to Pawlowski, it can expunge his criminal record. More importantly, it can overturn a troubling precedent that puts a chill on freedom of expression."The appeal is scheduled to be argued on September 10.
Lawyers for Artur Pawlowski filed a written legal argument with Alberta’s Court of Appeal last week arguing against his conviction for incitement of mischief.The appeal seeks to overturn Pawlowski’s conviction related to a speech he gave to protesters in Coutts, in February 2022. According to a provincial court judge, the speech was intended to incite protesters to continue the blockade of the highway which led to the U.S. border.The lawyers, who are funded by The Democracy Fund (TDF), have characterized Pawlowski’s prosecution as a “policing of words, opinion and language.” They argue that Pawlowski did not specifically encourage anyone to blockade the highway and that the trial judge’s finding was based on speculation and implication. TDF insists this is not enough to meet the high threshold required for a criminal conviction.The lawyers further argue that other interpretations are better supported by the text of the speech, including the interpretation that Pawlowski encouraged protestors to imitate Poland’s solidarity movement by walking out of their jobs, thereby expressing solidarity with the truckers and “paralyzing the system” through a legal means akin to a labour strike.Even if the Court of Appeal is satisfied that Pawlowski actively induced mischief, the lawyers argue in their written materials that the trial judge nevertheless failed to properly consider statutory defences that act as safeguards against government overreach. These safeguards prevent a person from being convicted of mischief if they are only communicating information or if they act with legal excuse or justification. In this case, Pawlowski’s justification was the constitutional exercise of free expression.Pawlowski received a 60-day jail sentence for delivering the speech, which he served in pretrial custody.In a press release, TDF said, "While a successful appeal cannot restore lost time to Pawlowski, it can expunge his criminal record. More importantly, it can overturn a troubling precedent that puts a chill on freedom of expression."The appeal is scheduled to be argued on September 10.
