A medical technology developer and patent researcher told the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) that SARS viruses were man-made with a view to population control and profiteering off of vaccines to treat them.
Dr. David Martin offered his testimony to the NCI Thursday in Edmonton. He cited his meticulous research to present a narrative of intentional biological weapon development and global health orchestration for both SARS-CoV-1 (the original SARS) and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).
Martin's research through his company M-CAM uncovered a series of critical patent filings. With the help of grants, Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina first developed a "chimeric Coronavirus" capable of targeting heart tissue. A patent filed by the university in 2001 described the ability to manipulate coronavirus.
"The invention may be carried out with any Coronavirus, such as human respiratory Coronavirus," the patent stated.
Martin quipped, "So, we have this SARS outbreak in 2002-2003 but that was basically a man-made virus."
Another Coronavirus-related patent filed April 25, 2003 to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) raised red flags to Martin. He said this patent was previously rejected twice because it sought patent protection based on information that was in the public domain, something that is supposed to be illegal.
A pharmaceutical company called Sequoia filed a vaccine patent just two days after the CDC's filing — an impossible feat without advance collaboration.
A National Science Foundation project from 2000-2010 demonstrated the ability to write mRNA into DNA, something Martin said bodes poorly for those who receive mRNA injections.
"Every time someone said that this is safe and it's not going to affect their DNA, they were lying," Martin asserts.
A Moderna patent application from April 2019 specifically mentions the "accident or deliberate release of a respiratory pathogen."
On September 18, 2019, months before the first reported COVID-19 case, the World Health Organization's Global Preparedness Monitoring Board published a document titled "World at Risk." The document's cover featured an image of a Coronavirus and called for countries to "be prepared for the worst, a rapidly spreading pandemic."
Just one day later, on September 19, 2019, President Donald Trump signed an executive order authorizing rapid vaccine development. "I can't comment on his capability of having culpability," he says, adding he doubted Trump even read the WHO document. "Something tells me that it all came through Alex Azar," then Secretary of Health and Human Services.
"All of this information was known in the public before December of 2019," Martin said. "None of the interventions are legally defined as emergency use medical countermeasures, because all of them were put in motion prior to the existence of the declared pandemic."
A timeline presented by Martin showed the European Investment Bank provided 50 million euros to BioNTech on December 17, 2019 — still prior to the first reported case. Moderna and BioNTech were already developing mRNA technologies.
Martin alleged Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskowitz "had the most to gain," having invested in both pandemic preparation and gene-editing technology through CRISPR. CRISPR technology was quickly authorized during the emergency use period.
The intellectual property expert depicted the pandemic as a brief part of a longer history of population control and medical intervention. "The progression of what I just laid out is something that has been going on now for 115 years," Martin said, as he screenshared a timeline.
Martin suggested a modern Nuremberg trial should take place for the SARS virus creators and corresponding vaccine manufacturers. He said he had prepared a criminal indictment and had met with "several attorneys generals in the United States" and Europe to discuss it.
"Every single law enforcement agency who has reviewed it has agreed that we have a standard beyond reasonable doubt violations of antitrust, racketeering, reckless homicide, and in some cases, in the use of remdesivir, premeditated murder. And to date, we have not had a single prosecutor who's been willing to take place because of the fear of retribution."
Whether accountability comes or not, more trouble looms.
"There are over 2,700 patents now covering 68 biological weapons that are poised for exactly the same effect that we had with COVID," Martin said.