When it comes to quitting smoking, Canada’s Health Minister Mark Holland seems to be living in the past. Instead of embracing proven harm-reduction strategies like vaping and nicotine pouches, he clings to outdated views likely shaped by his former employer, the Heart and Stroke Foundation. Holland’s heavy-handed crackdown on nicotine products that many smokers find effective is a blatant refusal to acknowledge global success stories. It also shows a disturbing disregard for the struggling Canadians who need these alternatives to quit smoking for good.The sad truth is that Holland’s policies simply do not line up with the evidence. Research around the world has shown that vaping, and more recently, nicotine pouches, can play a crucial role in helping smokers ditch cigarettes..Nicotine pouches a key tool in the global fight against smoking.Canada has made some progress in reducing smoking rates over the years, but it still has a long way to go. Recent data and international examples provide a clear picture of how nicotine alternatives can lead to nearly smoke-free societies. But instead of learning from these lessons, Holland is headed in the opposite direction by unnecessarily restricting adults' access to what many consider the most effective quitting tools available.If the minister bothered to look abroad, he might notice Sweden’s remarkable success. Sweden has effectively become the first smoke-free country in the world..IN-DEPTH: Sweden leads Europe in reducing smoking with nicotine pouches.While Health Canada and the Heart and Stroke Foundation pretend that heavily restricting vaping and nicotine pouches is the only answer, Sweden has embraced tobacco-free nicotine alternatives and seen real, measurable improvements. The country’s smoking rate has dipped to below 5%, which is considered the threshold for being “smoke-free.” Ask Swedes how they did it, and you won’t hear about banning vape flavours or making adult alternatives harder to find. Instead, you will hear about snus and nicotine pouches, which are products that have clearly helped people quit smoking and stay off cigarettes.This is not just some European quirk..U.S. lawmakers call out FDA for slow ‘smoke-free’ product review amid growing illegal market.The data is strong, and the trend is obvious: giving smokers safer, more appealing alternatives, rather than vilifying them, leads to lower smoking rates. Even the United Kingdom has taken a more open-minded approach, framing vaping as a legitimate quitting tool. Yet in Canada, Holland is busy cracking down on flavoured nicotine products, forcing them behind pharmacy counters, and restricting their promotion in ways that seem more aimed at pleasing the Heart and Stroke Foundation than at helping smokers who desperately need a lifeline.This is all deeply ironic considering that Health Canada approved Imperial Tobacco’s Zonnic, which is a flavoured nicotine pouch, as a smoking cessation aid for adults. These approvals were supposed to give adult smokers more tools, not fewer..Health Minister provides no evidence to support nicotine pouch restrictions.But under Holland’s watch, the landscape has become more confusing, more restricted, and less friendly to the people who count on these products to leave harmful cigarettes behind. His campaign makes it harder for adults to get the products they need, driving some back to smoking, which is an outcome that is the opposite of what any health minister should want.Holland’s critics have every right to call him out. His stance is painfully out of sync with the growing consensus among harm-reduction experts.Sure, no one wants to see children get hooked on nicotine. Protecting youth from addiction is important..Fewer U.S. teens vaping, few use nicotine pouches.But that can be achieved through strict age checks and targeted rules that keep these products away from teens without blocking adult smokers’ access to effective, safer alternatives. Instead of a balanced approach, Holland leans on broad, clumsy restrictions, treating all nicotine products as if they are equally harmful, regardless of their actual risk.We know cigarettes are deadly, and we know that vaping and nicotine pouches deliver nicotine without the same level of harmful toxins and carcinogens found in smoke. Countless studies support the idea that switching from smoking to these reduced-risk products can save lives. Think about it.If quitting smoking is the goal, doesn’t it make sense to offer easier paths to do so?.Smokers forced to drive hours to find pharmacies with nicotine pouches.Sweden’s example shows that by making safer products widely available, smokers do move away from cigarettes.It’s a straightforward concept that Holland chooses to ignore, presumably because it does not align with the stance he once proudly promoted with the Heart and Stroke Foundation.Of course, the Heart and Stroke Foundation continues to applaud his actions. They say that limiting access to flavoured vapes and nicotine pouches will keep them away from teens as if punishing adult smokers is just collateral damage..Donald Trump vows to "save vaping" from Biden, Harris.However, the job of a health minister is not to cater to one group’s outdated ideology. It is to serve all Canadians, including smokers who have tried everything else and find that vaping or nicotine pouches help them finally quit. If you acknowledge that not everyone can quit cigarettes through willpower or traditional means alone, then you must also acknowledge the importance of safer alternatives.Holland’s defenders might argue that these rules are for the greater good, claiming that any nicotine product risks hooking youth..Illegal nicotine pouches thrive in Minister Holland’s backyard.But if that were truly the minister’s priority, he would implement smarter, more nuanced regulations that would fiercely guard youth from these products while still protecting adult smokers’ right to access them. Instead, he sets blanket bans and slaps on severe restrictions, ignoring the nuanced research showing that well-regulated access to reduced-risk products leads to lower overall smoking rates.Also frustrating is the way Holland tries to paint vaping and nicotine pouches as new threats, while he ignores the hard facts of global success stories. Sweden’s approach shows that these products, properly regulated but not outright banned or demonized, can help achieve a smoke-free society faster than any other method..IN-DEPTH: UN Tobacco Report sparks global debate on harm reduction policies.This should be inspirational for Canada. Instead, it’s an inconvenient truth that Holland chooses to push aside.Critics who dare mention Sweden’s achievement are often met with silence. The minister and his supporters will not talk about how the use of snus and nicotine pouches, rather than harsh bans, helped Sweden all but eliminate cigarettes.They also conveniently fail to mention how other harm-reduction strategies have succeeded elsewhere..How a community uses nicotine pouches to help residents quit smoking, live healthier lives.Instead, they rely on fearmongering, painting vaping and nicotine pouches as shiny new traps for youth when the bulk of adult smokers who use them are doing so to leave behind a much more dangerous habit.This is not leadership, it’s stubbornness. Holland is pushing Canada in the wrong direction. While other countries move forward, learning from the data and embracing harm reduction, Canada’s health minister is stuck in the past, listening to the wrong voices and ignoring real-world success..UK vape ban sparks concerns over smoking relapse.Sweden has given the world a proven blueprint for drastically cutting smoking rates. Canada should take notes and adapt those lessons, not make it harder for Canadian smokers to follow a similar path.If protecting young people is the minister’s real priority, there are plenty of ways to do so without punishing adults. Strict ID checks, responsible marketing, and tougher penalties for stores that break the rules would make sense. Preventing nicotine pouch advertisements from targeting kids is fair..Report finds nicotine pouches could help Europe meet smoke-free goals decades sooner.But banning flavours that help adult smokers make the switch? That is misguided and cruel. It treats smokers, many of whom have battled addiction for decades, as if they simply do not deserve effective tools.In the end, Holland’s campaign against vaping and nicotine pouches is the worst kind of politics. A policy that looks good on a press release but fails the people it’s supposed to help. .Study finds switching from cigarettes to e-cigarettes may reduce respiratory issues.It may please the Heart and Stroke Foundation and similar organizations that refuse to follow the science, but it does nothing to move the country forward. It ignores Sweden’s inspiring achievement, dismisses the successful harm-reduction approaches abroad, and leaves Canadian smokers without the support they urgently need.Canada deserves better. Smokers deserve better. .Study warns nicotine pouch limits could push users back to cigarettes.We deserve a health minister who is willing to examine the evidence, learn from global best practices, and promote policies that reduce harm. Until Mark Holland stops pandering to his former employer’s outdated approach and starts acknowledging the science behind vaping and nicotine pouches, Canada’s fight against smoking will remain needlessly difficult. Smokers who long to quit will be left out in the cold, and the chance to follow Sweden’s lead toward a truly smoke-free future will slip even further away.
When it comes to quitting smoking, Canada’s Health Minister Mark Holland seems to be living in the past. Instead of embracing proven harm-reduction strategies like vaping and nicotine pouches, he clings to outdated views likely shaped by his former employer, the Heart and Stroke Foundation. Holland’s heavy-handed crackdown on nicotine products that many smokers find effective is a blatant refusal to acknowledge global success stories. It also shows a disturbing disregard for the struggling Canadians who need these alternatives to quit smoking for good.The sad truth is that Holland’s policies simply do not line up with the evidence. Research around the world has shown that vaping, and more recently, nicotine pouches, can play a crucial role in helping smokers ditch cigarettes..Nicotine pouches a key tool in the global fight against smoking.Canada has made some progress in reducing smoking rates over the years, but it still has a long way to go. Recent data and international examples provide a clear picture of how nicotine alternatives can lead to nearly smoke-free societies. But instead of learning from these lessons, Holland is headed in the opposite direction by unnecessarily restricting adults' access to what many consider the most effective quitting tools available.If the minister bothered to look abroad, he might notice Sweden’s remarkable success. Sweden has effectively become the first smoke-free country in the world..IN-DEPTH: Sweden leads Europe in reducing smoking with nicotine pouches.While Health Canada and the Heart and Stroke Foundation pretend that heavily restricting vaping and nicotine pouches is the only answer, Sweden has embraced tobacco-free nicotine alternatives and seen real, measurable improvements. The country’s smoking rate has dipped to below 5%, which is considered the threshold for being “smoke-free.” Ask Swedes how they did it, and you won’t hear about banning vape flavours or making adult alternatives harder to find. Instead, you will hear about snus and nicotine pouches, which are products that have clearly helped people quit smoking and stay off cigarettes.This is not just some European quirk..U.S. lawmakers call out FDA for slow ‘smoke-free’ product review amid growing illegal market.The data is strong, and the trend is obvious: giving smokers safer, more appealing alternatives, rather than vilifying them, leads to lower smoking rates. Even the United Kingdom has taken a more open-minded approach, framing vaping as a legitimate quitting tool. Yet in Canada, Holland is busy cracking down on flavoured nicotine products, forcing them behind pharmacy counters, and restricting their promotion in ways that seem more aimed at pleasing the Heart and Stroke Foundation than at helping smokers who desperately need a lifeline.This is all deeply ironic considering that Health Canada approved Imperial Tobacco’s Zonnic, which is a flavoured nicotine pouch, as a smoking cessation aid for adults. These approvals were supposed to give adult smokers more tools, not fewer..Health Minister provides no evidence to support nicotine pouch restrictions.But under Holland’s watch, the landscape has become more confusing, more restricted, and less friendly to the people who count on these products to leave harmful cigarettes behind. His campaign makes it harder for adults to get the products they need, driving some back to smoking, which is an outcome that is the opposite of what any health minister should want.Holland’s critics have every right to call him out. His stance is painfully out of sync with the growing consensus among harm-reduction experts.Sure, no one wants to see children get hooked on nicotine. Protecting youth from addiction is important..Fewer U.S. teens vaping, few use nicotine pouches.But that can be achieved through strict age checks and targeted rules that keep these products away from teens without blocking adult smokers’ access to effective, safer alternatives. Instead of a balanced approach, Holland leans on broad, clumsy restrictions, treating all nicotine products as if they are equally harmful, regardless of their actual risk.We know cigarettes are deadly, and we know that vaping and nicotine pouches deliver nicotine without the same level of harmful toxins and carcinogens found in smoke. Countless studies support the idea that switching from smoking to these reduced-risk products can save lives. Think about it.If quitting smoking is the goal, doesn’t it make sense to offer easier paths to do so?.Smokers forced to drive hours to find pharmacies with nicotine pouches.Sweden’s example shows that by making safer products widely available, smokers do move away from cigarettes.It’s a straightforward concept that Holland chooses to ignore, presumably because it does not align with the stance he once proudly promoted with the Heart and Stroke Foundation.Of course, the Heart and Stroke Foundation continues to applaud his actions. They say that limiting access to flavoured vapes and nicotine pouches will keep them away from teens as if punishing adult smokers is just collateral damage..Donald Trump vows to "save vaping" from Biden, Harris.However, the job of a health minister is not to cater to one group’s outdated ideology. It is to serve all Canadians, including smokers who have tried everything else and find that vaping or nicotine pouches help them finally quit. If you acknowledge that not everyone can quit cigarettes through willpower or traditional means alone, then you must also acknowledge the importance of safer alternatives.Holland’s defenders might argue that these rules are for the greater good, claiming that any nicotine product risks hooking youth..Illegal nicotine pouches thrive in Minister Holland’s backyard.But if that were truly the minister’s priority, he would implement smarter, more nuanced regulations that would fiercely guard youth from these products while still protecting adult smokers’ right to access them. Instead, he sets blanket bans and slaps on severe restrictions, ignoring the nuanced research showing that well-regulated access to reduced-risk products leads to lower overall smoking rates.Also frustrating is the way Holland tries to paint vaping and nicotine pouches as new threats, while he ignores the hard facts of global success stories. Sweden’s approach shows that these products, properly regulated but not outright banned or demonized, can help achieve a smoke-free society faster than any other method..IN-DEPTH: UN Tobacco Report sparks global debate on harm reduction policies.This should be inspirational for Canada. Instead, it’s an inconvenient truth that Holland chooses to push aside.Critics who dare mention Sweden’s achievement are often met with silence. The minister and his supporters will not talk about how the use of snus and nicotine pouches, rather than harsh bans, helped Sweden all but eliminate cigarettes.They also conveniently fail to mention how other harm-reduction strategies have succeeded elsewhere..How a community uses nicotine pouches to help residents quit smoking, live healthier lives.Instead, they rely on fearmongering, painting vaping and nicotine pouches as shiny new traps for youth when the bulk of adult smokers who use them are doing so to leave behind a much more dangerous habit.This is not leadership, it’s stubbornness. Holland is pushing Canada in the wrong direction. While other countries move forward, learning from the data and embracing harm reduction, Canada’s health minister is stuck in the past, listening to the wrong voices and ignoring real-world success..UK vape ban sparks concerns over smoking relapse.Sweden has given the world a proven blueprint for drastically cutting smoking rates. Canada should take notes and adapt those lessons, not make it harder for Canadian smokers to follow a similar path.If protecting young people is the minister’s real priority, there are plenty of ways to do so without punishing adults. Strict ID checks, responsible marketing, and tougher penalties for stores that break the rules would make sense. Preventing nicotine pouch advertisements from targeting kids is fair..Report finds nicotine pouches could help Europe meet smoke-free goals decades sooner.But banning flavours that help adult smokers make the switch? That is misguided and cruel. It treats smokers, many of whom have battled addiction for decades, as if they simply do not deserve effective tools.In the end, Holland’s campaign against vaping and nicotine pouches is the worst kind of politics. A policy that looks good on a press release but fails the people it’s supposed to help. .Study finds switching from cigarettes to e-cigarettes may reduce respiratory issues.It may please the Heart and Stroke Foundation and similar organizations that refuse to follow the science, but it does nothing to move the country forward. It ignores Sweden’s inspiring achievement, dismisses the successful harm-reduction approaches abroad, and leaves Canadian smokers without the support they urgently need.Canada deserves better. Smokers deserve better. .Study warns nicotine pouch limits could push users back to cigarettes.We deserve a health minister who is willing to examine the evidence, learn from global best practices, and promote policies that reduce harm. Until Mark Holland stops pandering to his former employer’s outdated approach and starts acknowledging the science behind vaping and nicotine pouches, Canada’s fight against smoking will remain needlessly difficult. Smokers who long to quit will be left out in the cold, and the chance to follow Sweden’s lead toward a truly smoke-free future will slip even further away.
