The Alberta Enterprise Group (AEG) and the Independent Contractors and Businesses Association (ICBA) have filed a constitutional challenge against the federal government, opposing sections of Bill C-59 that they argue unreasonably restrict free speech.The challenge, submitted to the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta, targets sections 236 and 239 of the Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2023. These amendments to the Competition Act impose strict limitations on how businesses can discuss environmental impacts, which the organizations say undermine free expression and open debate.“This case is about protecting the free flow of information and ideas — the cornerstone of a free and democratic society,” said Chris Gardner, ICBA President and CEO. “This is a direct attack on free expression and an egregious overreach by the Trudeau government — it’s a slippery slope when we start to rely on a government department to police legitimate debate and dialogue on important public policy matters.”AEG President Catherine Brownlee echoed these concerns, criticizing the law for stifling even truthful and reasonable discussions. “Important information for the public to consider is prohibited by the Act if it is not approved by some opaque verification process that the government has not defined,” Brownlee said.The organizations contend that the law not only violates Charter rights but also hinders economic growth and responsible resource development. Mike Martens, President of ICBA Alberta, highlighted the law’s uneven application, stating that while businesses are effectively silenced, critics of resource development remain free to voice unverified claims without scrutiny.“This creates a lopsided marketplace of ideas, where one essential participant — the business community — is effectively gagged,” he said.
The Alberta Enterprise Group (AEG) and the Independent Contractors and Businesses Association (ICBA) have filed a constitutional challenge against the federal government, opposing sections of Bill C-59 that they argue unreasonably restrict free speech.The challenge, submitted to the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta, targets sections 236 and 239 of the Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2023. These amendments to the Competition Act impose strict limitations on how businesses can discuss environmental impacts, which the organizations say undermine free expression and open debate.“This case is about protecting the free flow of information and ideas — the cornerstone of a free and democratic society,” said Chris Gardner, ICBA President and CEO. “This is a direct attack on free expression and an egregious overreach by the Trudeau government — it’s a slippery slope when we start to rely on a government department to police legitimate debate and dialogue on important public policy matters.”AEG President Catherine Brownlee echoed these concerns, criticizing the law for stifling even truthful and reasonable discussions. “Important information for the public to consider is prohibited by the Act if it is not approved by some opaque verification process that the government has not defined,” Brownlee said.The organizations contend that the law not only violates Charter rights but also hinders economic growth and responsible resource development. Mike Martens, President of ICBA Alberta, highlighted the law’s uneven application, stating that while businesses are effectively silenced, critics of resource development remain free to voice unverified claims without scrutiny.“This creates a lopsided marketplace of ideas, where one essential participant — the business community — is effectively gagged,” he said.
