David Johnston testified on Tuesday that they did not see “every bit of information we would like to” before saying that the cabinet did nothing wrong in dealing with the suspected Chinese election interference. . Chief Electoral Officer Stéphane PerraultChief Electoral Officer Stéphane Perrault .According to Blacklock’s Reporter, the members of the House Affairs committee were surprised that Johnston never spoke to Elections Canada..“We came to the conclusion set out there on the information that was available to us at that time,” testified Johnston. .The former governor general said he was “dealing with an ocean of information in eight short weeks” regarding suspicions that foreign agents meddled in parliamentary elections in 2019 and 2021..“Am I confident we saw every bit of information we would like to have had or perhaps should have had given the ocean of information?” said Johnston. .“The answer is no. I’m not sure how we could absorb any more than we had in the space of two weeks or eight weeks.”.Johnston became the prime minister's “special rapporteur” on March 15. .In his First Report, released on May 23, Johnston concluded that the cabinet was not at fault for handling security warnings about illegal activities involving Chinese agents. So far, one employee from China's Toronto Consulate has been expelled..“Are you saying you didn’t have all the material evidence and intelligence when you drafted your report?” asked Conservative MP Michael Cooper (St. Albert-Edmonton, ON). .“When we drafted our report, we had the intelligence then available,” replied Johnston..Bloc Québécois MP Alain Therrien (La Prairie, QC) questioned the depth of Johnston’s investigation. .“Did you meet with Chief Electoral Officer Stéphane Perrault?” asked Therrien. .“We did not,” replied Johnston..“Have you met with the Commissioner of Elections Caroline Simard?” asked Therrien. .“We did not,” replied Johnston..“I am really taken aback,” said Therrien. .“I am really aghast at what I have heard.”.In his report, Johnston rejected a public inquiry as “expensive,” “lengthy” and pointless. .READ MORE Johnston tells committee that public inquiries are ‘very expensive’.“In my view, a person leading a public inquiry would be unlikely to learn more about who knew what,” wrote Johnston..“Do You Not See?”.On Tuesday, the House Affairs committee members pointed out that most MPs in the House of Commons, except for the Liberal members, voted in favour of a public inquiry on March 2, March 23, and May 31..“I believed the vote was based on allegations that were false and that it would be wrong for me to simply step aside and say, ‘Well, let those allegations stand, you know, that’s the fact, that’s the truth,’” said Johnston. .“That would not be the right thing to do.”.“Mr. Johnston, with respect, you can’t determine how parliamentarians vote or why they vote that way,” replied New Democrat MP Peter Julian (New Westminster-Burnaby, BC) .“You mention you have deep respect for Parliament? You do need to heed a parliamentary vote.”.“How can you and the government restore trust and confidence in our democracy if the government continues to defy the democratic wishes of our only national democratic institution, the House of Commons?” asked Conservative MP Michael Chong (Wellington-Halton Hills, ON)..“I was asked by the government of the day to undertake a job,” replied Johnston..“Do you not see how recommending against a public inquiry undermines confidence in our democratic institutions?” asked Chong. .“What we intend to do in the next five months is have public hearings on these very important questions,” replied Johnston..READ MORE Johnston says using Liberal-associated law firm, close friend, no conflicts.The former governor general will testify at the Commons Public Accounts committee next Thursday. .The purpose of his testimony will be to discuss his involvement as a member of the Trudeau Foundation. .READ MORE Johnston testifies 'no conflict of interest' in Chinese election interference investigation.Johnston mentioned on Tuesday that he became a member of the Foundation in 2018 but resigned from his position on March 15 when he was appointed as a “special rapporteur.”.“Were you aware of reporting the Trudeau Foundation was targeted for a foreign influence campaign by Beijing and that the Foundation accepted $140,000 from the Communist dictatorship?” asked Conservative MP Michael Barrett (Leeds-Grenville, ON). .“The first knowledge I had of that particular gift was when it appeared in the newspaper,” replied Johnston..“Do you see a conflict of interest?” asked Barrett. .“My connection with the association of the Trudeau Foundation had no role whatsoever with the decision-making of the board of directors, the acceptance of gifts and so on,” replied Johnston..“You don’t see a conflict of interest?” asked Barrett. .“I do not see a conflict,” replied Johnston.
David Johnston testified on Tuesday that they did not see “every bit of information we would like to” before saying that the cabinet did nothing wrong in dealing with the suspected Chinese election interference. . Chief Electoral Officer Stéphane PerraultChief Electoral Officer Stéphane Perrault .According to Blacklock’s Reporter, the members of the House Affairs committee were surprised that Johnston never spoke to Elections Canada..“We came to the conclusion set out there on the information that was available to us at that time,” testified Johnston. .The former governor general said he was “dealing with an ocean of information in eight short weeks” regarding suspicions that foreign agents meddled in parliamentary elections in 2019 and 2021..“Am I confident we saw every bit of information we would like to have had or perhaps should have had given the ocean of information?” said Johnston. .“The answer is no. I’m not sure how we could absorb any more than we had in the space of two weeks or eight weeks.”.Johnston became the prime minister's “special rapporteur” on March 15. .In his First Report, released on May 23, Johnston concluded that the cabinet was not at fault for handling security warnings about illegal activities involving Chinese agents. So far, one employee from China's Toronto Consulate has been expelled..“Are you saying you didn’t have all the material evidence and intelligence when you drafted your report?” asked Conservative MP Michael Cooper (St. Albert-Edmonton, ON). .“When we drafted our report, we had the intelligence then available,” replied Johnston..Bloc Québécois MP Alain Therrien (La Prairie, QC) questioned the depth of Johnston’s investigation. .“Did you meet with Chief Electoral Officer Stéphane Perrault?” asked Therrien. .“We did not,” replied Johnston..“Have you met with the Commissioner of Elections Caroline Simard?” asked Therrien. .“We did not,” replied Johnston..“I am really taken aback,” said Therrien. .“I am really aghast at what I have heard.”.In his report, Johnston rejected a public inquiry as “expensive,” “lengthy” and pointless. .READ MORE Johnston tells committee that public inquiries are ‘very expensive’.“In my view, a person leading a public inquiry would be unlikely to learn more about who knew what,” wrote Johnston..“Do You Not See?”.On Tuesday, the House Affairs committee members pointed out that most MPs in the House of Commons, except for the Liberal members, voted in favour of a public inquiry on March 2, March 23, and May 31..“I believed the vote was based on allegations that were false and that it would be wrong for me to simply step aside and say, ‘Well, let those allegations stand, you know, that’s the fact, that’s the truth,’” said Johnston. .“That would not be the right thing to do.”.“Mr. Johnston, with respect, you can’t determine how parliamentarians vote or why they vote that way,” replied New Democrat MP Peter Julian (New Westminster-Burnaby, BC) .“You mention you have deep respect for Parliament? You do need to heed a parliamentary vote.”.“How can you and the government restore trust and confidence in our democracy if the government continues to defy the democratic wishes of our only national democratic institution, the House of Commons?” asked Conservative MP Michael Chong (Wellington-Halton Hills, ON)..“I was asked by the government of the day to undertake a job,” replied Johnston..“Do you not see how recommending against a public inquiry undermines confidence in our democratic institutions?” asked Chong. .“What we intend to do in the next five months is have public hearings on these very important questions,” replied Johnston..READ MORE Johnston says using Liberal-associated law firm, close friend, no conflicts.The former governor general will testify at the Commons Public Accounts committee next Thursday. .The purpose of his testimony will be to discuss his involvement as a member of the Trudeau Foundation. .READ MORE Johnston testifies 'no conflict of interest' in Chinese election interference investigation.Johnston mentioned on Tuesday that he became a member of the Foundation in 2018 but resigned from his position on March 15 when he was appointed as a “special rapporteur.”.“Were you aware of reporting the Trudeau Foundation was targeted for a foreign influence campaign by Beijing and that the Foundation accepted $140,000 from the Communist dictatorship?” asked Conservative MP Michael Barrett (Leeds-Grenville, ON). .“The first knowledge I had of that particular gift was when it appeared in the newspaper,” replied Johnston..“Do you see a conflict of interest?” asked Barrett. .“My connection with the association of the Trudeau Foundation had no role whatsoever with the decision-making of the board of directors, the acceptance of gifts and so on,” replied Johnston..“You don’t see a conflict of interest?” asked Barrett. .“I do not see a conflict,” replied Johnston.
