A tech entrepreneur and critic of COVID-19 vaccines says mRNA manufacturers can be sued because of their failure to disclose certain aspects of their vaccines to regulatory authorities.Steve Kirsch made the disclosure on Twitter ("X") in a post since viewed more than one million times. “Breaking: You can now sue the mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers for damages and the FDA is required to take the COVID vaccines off the market. Why? Adulteration. The plasmid bioactive contaminant sequences were NOT pointed out to the regulatory authorities. It's considered adulteration. I just got off the phone with Professor Byram Bridle and Dr. Robert Malone on this,” wrote Kirsch.Dr. David J. Speicher of the University of Guelph, along with four other collaborating scientists, recently found evidence of the offending plasmid Simion Virus 40 DNA in both Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, and in all 27 vials they surveyed. They said each vile exceeded the allowable residual DNA limits at least 188 times over and the worst vial was 509 times over the limits.On October 9, University of Guelph professor of viral immunology Byram Bridle made a presentation to the World Council for Health expressing his concerns. He said plasmid DNA has a role in the vaccine-making process but a “rookie scientist” under his personal supervision was able to remove it for a master’s level project. He cannot accept that the resources of multinational company could fail to do the same.“This plasmid DNA, there is no excuse that companies like Pfizer, Moderna, with all their money and all their expert scientists with all kinds of experience, the fact that they didn’t get rid of this is egregious. And I can’t comment on why it’s there, but it’s there and it absolutely should not be,” said Bridle.“I can’t emphasize this enough. This is incredibly concerning.”A recent legal precedent suggests lawsuits might be possible, Kirsch and Bridle suggested.In Michigan, Dan Nowacki received Redmdesivir to combat COVID-19 symptoms, but two of his five doses were from a contaminated lot that had glass particles. As a result, Nowacki had two strokes and lost a leg to amputation. A judge in the case said the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act did not protect manufacturers because glass particles were not part of the listed ingredients.Health Canada recently confirmed to Epoch Times Pfizer did not advise them of the presence of SV40."Health Canada expects sponsors to identify any biologically functional DNA sequences within a plasmid (such as an SV40 enhancer) at the time of submission," the agency said in an email to The Epoch Times."Although the full DNA sequence of the Pfizer plasmid was provided at the time of initial filing, the sponsor did not specifically identify the SV40 sequence."
A tech entrepreneur and critic of COVID-19 vaccines says mRNA manufacturers can be sued because of their failure to disclose certain aspects of their vaccines to regulatory authorities.Steve Kirsch made the disclosure on Twitter ("X") in a post since viewed more than one million times. “Breaking: You can now sue the mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers for damages and the FDA is required to take the COVID vaccines off the market. Why? Adulteration. The plasmid bioactive contaminant sequences were NOT pointed out to the regulatory authorities. It's considered adulteration. I just got off the phone with Professor Byram Bridle and Dr. Robert Malone on this,” wrote Kirsch.Dr. David J. Speicher of the University of Guelph, along with four other collaborating scientists, recently found evidence of the offending plasmid Simion Virus 40 DNA in both Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, and in all 27 vials they surveyed. They said each vile exceeded the allowable residual DNA limits at least 188 times over and the worst vial was 509 times over the limits.On October 9, University of Guelph professor of viral immunology Byram Bridle made a presentation to the World Council for Health expressing his concerns. He said plasmid DNA has a role in the vaccine-making process but a “rookie scientist” under his personal supervision was able to remove it for a master’s level project. He cannot accept that the resources of multinational company could fail to do the same.“This plasmid DNA, there is no excuse that companies like Pfizer, Moderna, with all their money and all their expert scientists with all kinds of experience, the fact that they didn’t get rid of this is egregious. And I can’t comment on why it’s there, but it’s there and it absolutely should not be,” said Bridle.“I can’t emphasize this enough. This is incredibly concerning.”A recent legal precedent suggests lawsuits might be possible, Kirsch and Bridle suggested.In Michigan, Dan Nowacki received Redmdesivir to combat COVID-19 symptoms, but two of his five doses were from a contaminated lot that had glass particles. As a result, Nowacki had two strokes and lost a leg to amputation. A judge in the case said the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act did not protect manufacturers because glass particles were not part of the listed ingredients.Health Canada recently confirmed to Epoch Times Pfizer did not advise them of the presence of SV40."Health Canada expects sponsors to identify any biologically functional DNA sequences within a plasmid (such as an SV40 enhancer) at the time of submission," the agency said in an email to The Epoch Times."Although the full DNA sequence of the Pfizer plasmid was provided at the time of initial filing, the sponsor did not specifically identify the SV40 sequence."
