In-house research conducted by the Department of Finance has characterized Minister Chrystia Freeland as boastful and self-congratulatory..According to Blacklock’s Reporter, a department report stated Canadians have also concluded Freeland was out of touch with economic realities concerning issues such as inflation and housing..“Participants were unsure whether Canada was going in the right or wrong direction,” wrote researchers. .“Among those who responded, half said Canada was going in the right direction while the other half said the country was going in the wrong direction.”.“Those who thought Canada was going in the wrong direction mostly mentioned the rising cost of housing, food and everyday consumer goods,” said the report Budget Day Focus Groups. .“Most participants rated the current state of the Canadian economy as being poor.”.The results were based on federal focus groups watching Freeland's budget speech in the House of Commons on March 28..The department of Finance spent $69,973 to have Léger Marketing observe people's reactions during and after Freeland's speech..Focus Groups showed the finance minister received the lowest ratings from voters under the age of 40..Researchers wrote that participants “struggled to recall specific positive moments in the speech itself” and had an overall impression of Freeland as boastful and self-satisfied. .“While not a specific measure, people often commented that aspects of the speech felt self-congratulatory,” said the report. .“Participants were somewhat cynical and questioned what had been actually accomplished or how useful the information was.”.“The self-congratulatory criticism came up again when discussing the government’s efforts to address rising cost,” said Focus Groups. .Voters did “not like the fact the government seemed to be self-congratulatory.” .“The Minister saying the inflation rate was coming back down was received particularly negatively among the group. Some participants felt prices were still high and did not see an improvement.”.Freeland, in her budget speech, referred to “investments” 13 times, boasted that “inflation is coming down” and said Canada “made a remarkable recovery” from the pandemic. .“I am so proud,” said Freeland..Focus Groups reported participants found the boastful comments to be off-putting..“Many commented that, while the intent was to reassure and use statistics to portray a brighter picture of the situation in Canada, the speech did not include any concrete measures to help Canadians face issues of affordability,” said the report..In her speech, Freeland also talked about the conflict in Ukraine..“The brave people of Ukraine have reminded us we must never take our freedom and our democracy for granted,” said Freeland. .Focus Groups said participants found the reference puzzling. “There was no clear connection as to why it was being discussed.”.Freeland also promised to “protect our environment” from climate change. Voters didn’t care, said Focus Groups. .“Measures on the ‘green economy’ left many participants indifferent or even uninterested,” wrote researchers. .“Several participants noted that housing was largely omitted from the budget speech along with details on the implementation of measures to help families cope with rising grocery prices.”
In-house research conducted by the Department of Finance has characterized Minister Chrystia Freeland as boastful and self-congratulatory..According to Blacklock’s Reporter, a department report stated Canadians have also concluded Freeland was out of touch with economic realities concerning issues such as inflation and housing..“Participants were unsure whether Canada was going in the right or wrong direction,” wrote researchers. .“Among those who responded, half said Canada was going in the right direction while the other half said the country was going in the wrong direction.”.“Those who thought Canada was going in the wrong direction mostly mentioned the rising cost of housing, food and everyday consumer goods,” said the report Budget Day Focus Groups. .“Most participants rated the current state of the Canadian economy as being poor.”.The results were based on federal focus groups watching Freeland's budget speech in the House of Commons on March 28..The department of Finance spent $69,973 to have Léger Marketing observe people's reactions during and after Freeland's speech..Focus Groups showed the finance minister received the lowest ratings from voters under the age of 40..Researchers wrote that participants “struggled to recall specific positive moments in the speech itself” and had an overall impression of Freeland as boastful and self-satisfied. .“While not a specific measure, people often commented that aspects of the speech felt self-congratulatory,” said the report. .“Participants were somewhat cynical and questioned what had been actually accomplished or how useful the information was.”.“The self-congratulatory criticism came up again when discussing the government’s efforts to address rising cost,” said Focus Groups. .Voters did “not like the fact the government seemed to be self-congratulatory.” .“The Minister saying the inflation rate was coming back down was received particularly negatively among the group. Some participants felt prices were still high and did not see an improvement.”.Freeland, in her budget speech, referred to “investments” 13 times, boasted that “inflation is coming down” and said Canada “made a remarkable recovery” from the pandemic. .“I am so proud,” said Freeland..Focus Groups reported participants found the boastful comments to be off-putting..“Many commented that, while the intent was to reassure and use statistics to portray a brighter picture of the situation in Canada, the speech did not include any concrete measures to help Canadians face issues of affordability,” said the report..In her speech, Freeland also talked about the conflict in Ukraine..“The brave people of Ukraine have reminded us we must never take our freedom and our democracy for granted,” said Freeland. .Focus Groups said participants found the reference puzzling. “There was no clear connection as to why it was being discussed.”.Freeland also promised to “protect our environment” from climate change. Voters didn’t care, said Focus Groups. .“Measures on the ‘green economy’ left many participants indifferent or even uninterested,” wrote researchers. .“Several participants noted that housing was largely omitted from the budget speech along with details on the implementation of measures to help families cope with rising grocery prices.”
