United Conservative MLAs are rallying against the impending Justin Trudeau 2035 net-zero electricity regulations, a move that could lead to a dramatic escalation in power costs for families and businesses across the province..A recent report by the Public Policy Forum has projected the staggering price tag of the 2035 plan at a colossal $1.7 trillion, leaving Alberta to bear a share potentially in the hundreds of billions of dollars. .Parliamentary Secretary for Affordability and Utilities, Chantelle de Jonge, minced no words in her critique of the plan's architects. She asserted that Justin Trudeau, Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault, and Alberta NDP leader Rachel Notley have chosen to overlook the ordinary individuals who would bear the brunt of the federal plan.."The far-left ideology underpinning this ambitious 2035 timeline would plunge numerous Albertans and Canadians into economic hardship," de Jonge said.."This inconvenient truth remains consciously ignored by Justin Trudeau, Steven Guilbeault, and Rachel Notley. We are acutely aware that this policy would result in an unprecedented surge in power bills for Albertans. The United Conservatives stand unwavering in our resolve: we will not permit this dire scenario to unfold."."The constitution clearly establishes electricity generation as our exclusive right and responsibility as a province. While we are open to collaborating on a pragmatic 2050 timeline for achieving carbon neutrality, we will not jeopardize the lives and livelihoods of our citizens before then.".Nolan Dyck, the representative for Grande Prairie, expressed his disappointment in the alignment of the Notley NDP with the Trudeau Liberals, at the expense of Alberta's families and enterprises.."This ill-fated 2035 strategy has sowed substantial apprehension and instability concerning the affordability and consistency of electricity, especially for small business operators who form the bedrock of our economy," Dyck said.."This accelerated timeline equates to an assault on ordinary individuals, many of whom have chosen our province and country for their freedom and security. This 2035 blueprint is exceptionally flawed. The Notley NDP should feel a sense of embarrassment for aligning with the Trudeau Liberals on this net-zero 2035 scheme, a move that is even opposed by the Saskatchewan NDP.".Myles McDougall, MLA for Calgary-Fish Creek, said the UCP has a pragmatic and attainable route towards achieving carbon neutrality by 2050.."We have consistently advocated for a carbon-neutral electricity system that is cost-effective, dependable, and secure. This is an objective that can be accomplished by 2050, but not by 2035. That timeline simply defies the realms of realism," McDougall said.."Crucially, any endorsed plan must take into account the pace at which emissions can be curtailed, aligned with the financial capacities of individuals. Diverging from the Trudeau Liberals and the Notley NDP, the United Conservatives will not thrust people into poverty under any circumstances. The well-being of ordinary families and enterprises must be the foremost concern in policy-making, not the last."
United Conservative MLAs are rallying against the impending Justin Trudeau 2035 net-zero electricity regulations, a move that could lead to a dramatic escalation in power costs for families and businesses across the province..A recent report by the Public Policy Forum has projected the staggering price tag of the 2035 plan at a colossal $1.7 trillion, leaving Alberta to bear a share potentially in the hundreds of billions of dollars. .Parliamentary Secretary for Affordability and Utilities, Chantelle de Jonge, minced no words in her critique of the plan's architects. She asserted that Justin Trudeau, Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault, and Alberta NDP leader Rachel Notley have chosen to overlook the ordinary individuals who would bear the brunt of the federal plan.."The far-left ideology underpinning this ambitious 2035 timeline would plunge numerous Albertans and Canadians into economic hardship," de Jonge said.."This inconvenient truth remains consciously ignored by Justin Trudeau, Steven Guilbeault, and Rachel Notley. We are acutely aware that this policy would result in an unprecedented surge in power bills for Albertans. The United Conservatives stand unwavering in our resolve: we will not permit this dire scenario to unfold."."The constitution clearly establishes electricity generation as our exclusive right and responsibility as a province. While we are open to collaborating on a pragmatic 2050 timeline for achieving carbon neutrality, we will not jeopardize the lives and livelihoods of our citizens before then.".Nolan Dyck, the representative for Grande Prairie, expressed his disappointment in the alignment of the Notley NDP with the Trudeau Liberals, at the expense of Alberta's families and enterprises.."This ill-fated 2035 strategy has sowed substantial apprehension and instability concerning the affordability and consistency of electricity, especially for small business operators who form the bedrock of our economy," Dyck said.."This accelerated timeline equates to an assault on ordinary individuals, many of whom have chosen our province and country for their freedom and security. This 2035 blueprint is exceptionally flawed. The Notley NDP should feel a sense of embarrassment for aligning with the Trudeau Liberals on this net-zero 2035 scheme, a move that is even opposed by the Saskatchewan NDP.".Myles McDougall, MLA for Calgary-Fish Creek, said the UCP has a pragmatic and attainable route towards achieving carbon neutrality by 2050.."We have consistently advocated for a carbon-neutral electricity system that is cost-effective, dependable, and secure. This is an objective that can be accomplished by 2050, but not by 2035. That timeline simply defies the realms of realism," McDougall said.."Crucially, any endorsed plan must take into account the pace at which emissions can be curtailed, aligned with the financial capacities of individuals. Diverging from the Trudeau Liberals and the Notley NDP, the United Conservatives will not thrust people into poverty under any circumstances. The well-being of ordinary families and enterprises must be the foremost concern in policy-making, not the last."
