EYRE: No more ‘cat’s paw’ for Alberta — Ottawa’s war on energy created the independence movement it fears

Permission to invoke an Aesopian fable to draw a parallel in Canadian politics? … Thank you.In the fable The Monkey and the Cat, Bertrand the monkey persuades Raton the cat to retrieve chestnuts roasting in fireplace embers, promising him a share. Raton plucks them from the fire, one by one, but repeatedly burns his paw, as Bertrand gobbles up all the chestnuts. Raton gets nothing for his pains.It’s from this fable that the French get their phrase tirer les marrons du feu, meaning to benefit from the work of others. It’s also the source of the English idiom “a cat's paw’’ — i.e., one who’s been suckered.We don’t learn whether Raton, with his burned paws, later realizes that he’s been duped. But the fable-counterpart in Canadian politics — I’m referring, of course, to Alberta — is all too aware that it’s been played for a schmuck since its inception in 1905.At the time, Liberal PM Wilfrid Laurier shrewdly split the proposed ‘Province of Buffalo,’ now Alberta and Saskatchewan, right down the one hundred and tenth meridian. This vitiated a powerful Western entity with enormous political and energy potential. Unlike the Confederation’s original provinces, Alberta and Saskatchewan weren’t given control over their own natural resources until 1930, and were never properly compensated for 25 years of lost royalties.Little wonder that many Albertans have correctly viewed their historic relationship with Ottawa as marginalized and exploitative, designed to fuel the economic growth of Central Canada while restricting their own wealth and political economy..When Albertans point out such injustices and attempt to redress them, they’re scorned and scoffed at. “Unpatriotic!” the pundits cry. “Victims of Russian-US exploitation!” Quebec, on the other hand, has always been indulged. In the ’90s, car decals across the country proclaimed “My Canada includes Quebec.” I haven’t seen any equivalent “My Canada includes Alberta” decals. Have you?In fact, such is the depth of Central Canada’s disdain for Alberta that one repeatedly wonders. Why do you care if Albertans are spearheading a secession movement? What difference does it make to you? You flog your love of Canada — but as for the West, that mile-wide love is only an inch deep.Globe and Mail columnist Gary Mason recently mocked Alberta’s claims about one-way equalization payments as “old canards” and “tired falsehoods.” His argument: Albertans are taxed at the same rate as people in other provinces. What he omits, of course, is that Alberta has received .002% of all equalization payments since the program began in 1957. As the Alberta writer Colin MacLeod put it, “That’s money for other provinces’ infrastructure, as our own crumbles.”Former AB premier Jason Kenney recently dismissed would-be “separatists” (at last formal count, 301,620 strong) as a “perennially angry minority” who risk emulating Quebec’s decade-long, “sterile, pointless, political civil war.” If enough “frustrated federalists” vote, he warned a Toronto audience, the “separatist” movement could go from a “marginal fringe to a real factor.”Try telling Quebecers that their separatist-sovereignist aspirations are pointless or “illegal” — or that communicating with other countries about separation, as Quebec separatists long did with the Basques and the Scots, is “treasonous,” as Premier David Eby recently called the Albertan independence movement.Quebecers have never been hesitant about asserting provincial autonomy. When Quebec Conservative leader Éric Duhaime was in Saskatchewan recently promoting his book Destination Autonomy: Expanding Quebec’s Powers Within the Canadian Confederation, he praised the Saskatchewan First Act (which I proudly introduced as Attorney General) for constitutionally protecting provincial natural resources from federal interference: “It’s inspiring to have something concrete … to fight for more autonomy and denounce intervention in provincial jurisdiction.”.As for why Albertans might be, in Kenney’s words, “frustrated federalists,” where to begin?! The National Energy Program? Thwarted “Triple-E” Senate reform? The last “lost decade,” which saw the introduction of one piece of economically devastating federal legislation after another?Under Bill C-69, for example, the Baie du Nord oil drilling project off Newfoundland was approved, but Western projects and pipelines were stymied. Bill C-48 banned Asia-bound tankers from gaining a 36-hour trade time advantage from deep-water ports such as Prince Rupert, but Canada continued to import oil from rogue nations like Venezuela. And oh, for Energy East, which would have ensured a made-in-Canada oil and gas supply/refining chain — but was killed off by a weaponized National Energy Board.More recently, as a quid pro quo for supposed new pipelines, Alberta has been hoodwinked by the feds into a $130 (from $95) per tonne minimum price on industrial carbon emissions and an obscenely expensive oil sands carbon capture plan.If the Keystone XL, Energy East, and Northern Gateway projects had gone ahead, Premier Smith recently posted, “…they would be generating 2.5 million barrels of oil per day and about $55 billion in GDP for the country. That’s billions of additional dollars that could have been used to address health care, education, and more. That’s what I look at — the missed opportunity of the last ten years.”We are slowly waking up to the fact that Canadian “major projects” are being squelched by a self-created Frankenstein web of politicized courts, a command economy, and indigenous and climate litigation. Ironically, what’s really going to unlock Canada’s oil will be the US-bound “Bridger” pipeline, presidentially approved by Donald Trump..In this cat-and-monkey game, the key grievance that smoulders in the minds of Albertans wanting redress is equalization — and the phony distinctions that categorize Ontario and Quebec as ‘have not.’ Over the last half-century, “some $600 billion has been taken out of Alberta so it can be spent mostly in Quebec and in other places that vote Liberal,” says Premier Smith. While Western oil and gas revenues are included in the equalization formula, Hydro-Québec subsidizes electricity costs rather than charging market rates. Thus, Québec’s hydro wealth is not fully accounted for and — you guessed it — the province receives equalization payments.Of the record $26.2 billion earmarked for equalization payments for 2025-26, Canada’s three westernmost provinces won’t see a cent of it. Once again, they will be relinquishing billions, especially to Quebec, which will take in $13.6 billion, up a quarter billion from 2024-25.Critics of Alberta independence are fond of pointing out that they would have to deal with the Clarity Act. Passed in 2000, this legislation stipulates that the federal government will negotiate a province’s secession only if a provincial referendum asks a “clear question” on independence and receives a “clear majority.” One wonders what would happen if Albertans responded with a “Sucks to your Clarity Act…We’re seceding!” Call it Alberta’s own version of extinguishment or corporate nullification.Premier Smith’s comments on the topic are decidedly more temperate: she supports a “sovereign Alberta within a united Canada.” A sovereign Alberta within a united Canada. Hmm. That’s a succinct definition of home rule — a form of de-centralized self-rule that has precedent in Ireland, Switzerland, Greenland, India, and elsewhere.That’s a topic for another day. But it sounds like a hell of a plan — not only for our patriotic friends in Central Canada, but Alberta itself. Think about it: self-rule, albeit limited, within the country at large. And no more playing the patsy cat’s paw!

EYRE: No more ‘cat’s paw’ for Alberta — Ottawa’s war on energy created the independence movement it fears

Related Stories

CARPAY: Too much tolerance for censorship in Alberta

MORGAN: Alberta’s independence movement must dump its bad actors before voters dump it

KAVANAGH: Alberta needs more tradespeople in classrooms — not just more education degrees

BAKLINSKI: We’re a peaceful pro-life organization — The Canadian Anti-Hate Network targeted us